Friday, July 13, 2012

WE'VE MOVED

I actually bought the domain name on Wordpress, and I'm going to use that blog now. Here's the address:

emisformovies.com

Still be sure to follow me on Twitter @EmisforMovies

Thanks for your guys' support!

Geek-ily yours,

     Miss Em

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Tuesday Review for You: Moulin Rouge! (2001)


Welcome to the Moulin Rouge!

For a movie such as this–being a Baz Luhrmann production–I recommend that you all find a seatbelt and buckle up before you try your luck at watching it. I apologize for the cliché, but this movie's editing and pace is much like riding a roller coaster that was designed by the schizophrenic love-child of Tim Burton and Salvador Dali...In other words, Luhrmann.
So please, give yourself a moment to grab some motion sickness medication and enjoy the review.

"A story about a time, a story about a place...But above all things, a story about love."

Before we go on to talk about the technical aspects of the film, here are a few things that you need to know:

The film takes place in turn of the century France, and revolves around aspiring poet and bohemian Christian (Ewan McGregor) in his quest for freedom, beauty, truth, and most of all love. After joining an acting troupe and writing a play, he leaves for the Moulin Rouge to persuade the courtesan Satine (Nicole Kidman) to agree to put it on. While pitching his idea, the two fall in love but are forced to keep mum about the ordeal. In order for the show to be produced and to keep the Moulin Rouge in business, Satine must seduce the Duke (Richard Roxburgh), which leads to a whirlwind of drama and tragedy in the film.

Geek Out Moment: The film's story line is an amalgamation of not only one, but three operas: "Great Performances: La bohéme," "La traviata" and "Orpheus in the Underworld."

"There was a boy, a very strange enchanted boy..."

...And his name was Baz Luhrmann. As a director, Luhrmann is either one who is blatantly criticized or widely acclaimed; the poor guy just rarely seems to catch a break from critics. The primary reason behind this–as I eluded to at the beginning of this review–is due to his fast-paced editing style and his excessive use of bright colors. Both factors should subject his films to have a warning show before they start for people who get motion sick fairly easily or who suffer from seizures.

Moulin Rouge! was the first of his that I've ever seen, and I suffered from a sensory overload for what felt like days for lack of preparation for the many sharp turns, rapid changes and the vortex of colors and songs that would intoxicate my senses. But it wasn't only his directing technique that offset me, but also the writing. The script for the movie was co-written by Luhrmann and Craig Pearce, and in my point of view, suffered from bipolarity. At one moment it was sombre, then outlandishly ecstatic, creepy and then would flip to a romantically gooey scene. Each scene had dialoge to match, and although the writing was as out-of-control as it seemed...It worked.

Everything, every little element that Luhrmann added in to this film worked out. Why? Well, it all served a purpose. Here you have this wide-eyed and love-obsessed, never-been-loved poet who leaves his quiet life in London to the center of an artistic and bohemian revolution in Paris. The camera direction and the vivacious color scheme hit the audience as violently as it hit Christian. The pacing needs to be fast-paced so that the audience feels how new and exciting this new environment is to him. The writing also plays its part well, building up how utterly insane and chaotic the lives of the characters are, and all of the songs that were mashed and redone (that yes, Luhrmann played a part in perfecting) helped the story progress very well. In fact, the El Tango de Roxanne is one of my favorite songs...ever.

In other words, this very, very strange enchanting boy did his job very well...Albeit painfully so.

"He's got a huge...talent."

Yes, all of the actors who were a part of this movie do have quite a bit of talent; however, I wouldn't pick this out as a movie to study if you were an aspiring actor. If this movie is good, it's due to the art direction and the editing, not the acting (although Kidman was nominated for an Oscar for her performance).

The actors approached this movie, and performed it as one would a stage production: slightly overdone with exaggerated emotional responses and line delivery. In any other movie, this would not be acceptable, but it blends well with the overall feel that the film puts off. For the most part, they all pull their weight and evoke whatever emotions they are meant to, but that's as far as it goes really. However, there is one scene at the end of the film where McGregor breaks out into a sob that would make Toby Maguire's cry scene in Spider-Man 3 look worthy of an Academy Award.


Another Geek Out Moment:Nicole Kidman fractured two ribs and injured her knee while rehearsing a dance routine for the film. Many scenes where she was shot from the waist up were shot while she was in a wheelchair.

"Come what may"

This movie, despite all of its flash and flair, is one that is rather enjoyable. After I watched this a second time on my own, and a third and fourth and fifth time with friends, I found that it is a great movie night type of film. If you end up watching it, please watch it with a group of people. One does not simply watch Moulin Rouge!, one must experience it. Once you do that, you'll like it a heck of a lot more, and the reason behind your headache will be from your pals' attempts to sing a duet with Ewan McGregor, not from the scene transitions.

All in all, I give this movie a 3 out of 5 stars. 


Be sure to weigh in on what you think of the movie in the comments below and to also leave behind suggestions for next Tuesday's review!

Geek-ily yours,

Ms. Emily

Monday, July 9, 2012

Just a Little Taste...

...Of What I'm All About


This is an article that I wrote for my high school newspaper that took first at districts for the Nebraska state competition and first for the UNO High School Media competition for entertainment/review writing. Personally, I feel that it's not the strongest article that I've ever written–I am brutally honest about what I critique, especially my own stuff– but a lot of other people seemed to like it and I had a lot of fun writing it. I feel like it'll be a good opening Get-To-Know-Me blog post while you lot are letting me know what movies to review. So without further adieu, here's Hollywood...we have a problem:



I just had the coolest dream: I was having breakfast at Tiffany’s with Jimmy Stewart. We were eating some duck soup while we were looking out the rear window, when all of a sudden we witnessed something astonishing. All was quiet on the western front when a raging bull tried to kill a mocking bird. When one of the chicks flew over the cuckoo’s nest, Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid threw sixteen candles at young Frankenstein on the waterfront, and then his girl, Friday, and I started singing in the rain across 42nd Street.
Anyway, even though this dream may seem crazy and in desperate need of psychiatric review, I enjoyed it thoroughly. It was jam-packed with old movie allusions, and it got me thinking: I miss movies like those.
Sure, some of them don't have color, or high-budget explosions, but they were really high-caliber films. 
This thought then got me thinking about another thought, which brought me to this: what happened? When did movies start losing that sheen that it had back in the day? When did we start caring so much about money in the movie business and less about the art of crafting a film that someone could be proud of distributing? 
Movie companies coulda had class. They coulda been contenders instead of bums, which they are; let’s face it. They’ve been selling themselves short with cheap laughs and jaw-dropping stunts for the sake of making money. They care too much about being the next box office hit and are neglecting to add any emotion into what they have the responsibility to craft. Movies are supposed to satisfy its audience with great performances and film direction. They’re supposed to be a banquet, and most poor suckers are starving to death!
The fact of the matter is that you don’t need all of that fodder to make a great film. We’ve fallen under the illusion that movies can only be successful if they contain so much CGI, crudeness and vulgarity. That notion simply isn’t true. Sure, those elements make the movie box office gold, but once it leaves the theatres its just another flashy movie that folks will forget about as soon as another CGI-filled movie comes along to trump it. Remember ‘Transformers?’ Of course you don’t, and why? Because it held no emotional or thematic value; that’s why. 
There is, believe it or not, such thing as a movie with integrity, a movie with feelings and emotions. Film wasn’t always as flashy as it is now, and yet it still survived: Charlie Chaplin was able to craft works of art for years that both moved audiences to laughter and tears without uttering a single word; Walt Disney was able to derive a strong, heart-felt response with “Dumbo” without having the title character even speak; and some of the greatest love stories that have been depicted with film, such as “Pride and Prejudice” and “Cyrano de Bergerac,” were as heart-felt as they were because of the actors’ performances and the dialogue rather than with risqué behaviors.
So hear me out, Hollywood. Go back to producing movies like you used to back in the day. Look deep within yourself and give us a good, old-fashioned simple action movie like “Star Wars,” a clean-cut drama like “Cabaret” and a comedy that doesn’t reek with constant cursing, like “Blazing Saddles.” It really isn’t a lot to ask of you, and you’ll reap the rewards in the long run. You may not make so much at the box office, but who cares if they don’t show you the money? At least you’ll win the hearts and minds of your viewing audience and money isn’t that the only thing that really matters, anyway? So, I’m going to make you an offer that you can’t refuse. Make a movie worth watching, or else like the “Terminator” series, I’ll be back. 

So, there you are! I hope that you enjoyed the article as much as those other–most likely older–judges did. If you want to read a lot more fantastic articles that my high school newspaper puts out that are extremely well-written and wonderful, visit The Bolt. I guarantee that it'll be worth your time. 
Feel free to comment! Was that piece that I wrote rubbish, do you agree, disagree? Let me know in the comments below, and don't forget to let me know what you would like me to review tomorrow.
Until then, have a lovely day!

Geek-ily yours,
 Ms. Em

An Introduction


You Want MY Opinion? Are You SURE About That?

What exactly are you going to be opining on?
---Glad you asked. Mainly about movies that I've seen recently and movie news.

When are you going to be doing this?
---Another good question. Ten points to Gryffindor. I'll be reviewing movies twice a week: One movie that maybe you are interested in seeing, and one movie that I have seen that I want to talk about. I'll also comment on the week's movie news when the box office results come in.
---So, overall this is how my schedule is going to look like:
       •Tuesdays: My Reviews
       •Fridays: Reader's Choice
       •Sundays: Movie News

Why should I listen to your opinion?
---Well, I've won awards for my writing if you want to listen to them...
•University of Nebraska-Lincoln High School State Competition: First Place Entertainment Review Writing (Districts) Fifth Place Entertainment Review Writing (State)
•University of Nebraska Omaha High School Media Contest: First Place Column, Feature Story, Sports Story, Review Story, Broadcast Feature Story
---And for your information: Yes, I am shamelessly self-promoting myself because I can.

When will you review your first movie for us?
---July 9, 2012. This means that you have time to submit a movie that you're interested in seeing. You can do so by either commenting on this story or by tweeting me @EmisforMovies

I can't wait to hear from you guys and to start reviewing stuff for all of you!
Geek-ily yours,
       ~Ms. Em
FYI: Movies don't have to be current. If you're interested in a classic movie, or one that you're contemplating about buying on DVD, feel free to ask me to review that as well.